![]() |
|
Tema 1: Importancia de los canales de Navegación. Geoestrategia para la integración regional. Nicolás Boscovich. Buenos Aires. 1999. Planning and design of navigation locks. US Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-2-2602. 1995. http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-manuals Estudio de dragado del Canal de Acceso al Puerto de Bahía Blanca. Consorcio NEDECO - ARCONSULT. Volumen I, II y III. DNCPyVN. Octubre 1983. Esclusas Argentinas. Download.
Tema 2: La navegación como sistema. Approach
channels
– A guide for design. PIANC.
June 1997. Channel
Design and Vessel Maneuverability – Next Steps.
William O. Gray. Coastal
Engineering Manual – Part V: Coastal Project Planning and Design –
Chapter 5.
US
Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-2-1100. 2003. http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-manuals
Tema 3: Características físicas. Coastal
Engineering Manual – Part II – Chapter 8: Hydrodinamic Analysis and
Design Conditions.
US
Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-2-1100. 2003. http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-manuals Coastal
Engineering Manual – Part V: Coastal Project Planning and Design –
Chapter 2.
US
Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-2-1100. 2003. http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-manuals
Los
Modelos de Simulación Aplicados a la Planificación Portuaria – Estudio
de Caso: El Sistema Portuario de Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Carlos
E. Ginés. Escuela de Graduados en Ingeniería Portuaria. 2005. Safety
and Capacity Wet Infrastructure Puerto América, Venezuela. R.
Groenveld, I. Onassis, H. J. Van Wijhe. PIANC 30th International
Navigation Congress. S7B P102. Sydney. September 2002. Download. Port
Everglades WAM.
US
Army Engineers District, Jacksonville. Planning
Guidance Notebook.
US
Army Engineers.
Ensuring
the Safe and Efficient Movement of Ships in Channels. Jennifer K.
Waters, Alan L. Blume. PIANC 30th International Navigation Congress. S8C
P121. Sydney. September 2002. Shipping
Trends Analysis. Jennifer K. Waters, Robert H. Mayer, David L.
Krieber. US Naval Academy. September 2000. Tipos
de Buques I. Germán de Melo. Master Internacional en Gestión
Portuaria. Tipos
de Buques II. Germán de Melo. Master Internacional en Gestión
Portuaria. Vessel
Fleet Forecast Methodology Unit. Ian Mathis, Jennifer Waters, Carolyn
Judge. The Navigation Economic Technologies Program. USACE. Vessel
Load Factor Analysis. Ian Mathis, Jennifer Waters, Carolyn Judge. The
Navigation Economic Technologies Program. USACE.
Tema 6: Traza. Elementos de diseño. Safe
Waterways – Part 1(a): Guidelines for the Safe Design of Commercial
Shipping Channels.
Fisheries and Oceans. Canada.
Safe
Waterways – Part 1(a): Guidelines for the Safe Design of Commercial
Shipping Channels. Fisheries and Oceans. Canada.
Tema 8: Otros elementos de diseño. Safe
Waterways – Part 1(a): Guidelines for the Safe Design of Commercial
Shipping Channels.
Fisheries and Oceans. Canada.
Hydraulic Design of Deep-Draft Navigation Projects. US Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-2-1613. 2006. http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-manuals
Tema 10: Ancho de una vía navegable.
Tema 11: Profundidad de una vía navegable. Underkeel
Clearance for Large Ships in Maritime Fairways with Hard Bottom.
PIANC. 1985. Probability
Assesment for Deep-Draft Navigation Channel Design.
Michael J. Briggs, Leon E. Borgman, Eivind Bratteland. Coastal
Engineering 48. 2003. Tide
Cycle Analysis & Underkeel Clearance (UKC) Verification.
Karl
Sundar, Ian Mathis. The Navigation Economic Technologies Program. USACE.
Charleston
Harbor Ship Motion Data Collection and Squat Analysis.
Michael J. Briggs, Stephen T. Maynord, Charles R. Nickles, Terry N.
Waller. US Army Corps of Engineers. ERDC/CHL CHETN-IX-14. 2004. Vessel
Motion in Confined Waterways / Enhancements to ERDC-WES Channel Analysis
and Design Evaluation Tool (CADET). Ian Mathis. The Navigation
Economic Technologies Program. USACE. 2005.
Application
of CAORF Simulation to Optimizing Channel Design and Maintenance.
Joseph Puglisi. CAORF/JSACC 2000 International. Shiphandling
Simulation: Application to Waterway Design.
William C. Webster (ed.). National Research Council. 1992.
Tema 16: SHIPMA, modelo matemático fast-time.
Tema 17: TOOLBOX, modelo matemático.
Tema 20. Simuladores de maniobra marítima. Port
of Baltimore Navigation Simulation Study. Gary C. Lynch. US Army Corps
of Engineers. ERDC/CHL TR-01-6. 2001. The
Flemish Pilotage. D. H. Martens. DAB Loodswezen. Simulation as Design Tool for Federal Channels. Dennis W. Webb. US Army Corps of Engineers.
Barbers
Point Harbor Physical Model Navigation Study. Gordon S. Harkins, Cecil
C. Dorrell. US Army Corps of Engineers. ERDC/CHL TR-00-2. 2000. Deep-Draft
Entrance Channels: Preliminary Comparisons Between Field and Laboratory
Measurements. Michael J. Briggs, Ivano Melito, Zeki Demirbilek, Frank
Sargent. US Army Corps of Engineers. ERDC/CHL CHETN-IX-7. 2001. The
Future Role of Experimental Methods European Hydraulic Research. Ad
van Os, Richard Soulsby, Jens Kierkegaard. HYDRALAB Strategy Paper. 2004.
15
Years Experience With Fluid Mud: Definition of the Nautical Bottom with
Reological Parameters. Rewert Wurpts and Patrick Torn. Terra
et Aqua – Number 99 – June 2005. Nautical
Depth Survey System. Pei Wenbin. Hydro International. September 2003. Ship
Behaviour in Muddy Navigation Areas. Mark Vantorre. Nautical Bottom
Workshop. Antwerp. April 2005. Lessons
Learned form Existing Projects on Shoaling in Harbors and Navigation
Channels. Trimbak M. Parchure, Allen M. Teeter. US Army Corps of
Engineers. ERDC/CHL CHETN-XIV-5. 2002. Potential
Methods for Reducing Shoaling in Harbors and Navigation Channels. Trimbak
M. Parchure, Allen M. Teeter. US Army Corps of Engineers. ERDC/CHL
CHETN-XIV-6. 2002. Dredging
Not Required? Hydromotion Technical Briefing XL / 4-3-01. Evaluation
of New Fluid Mud Survey at Field Sites. Dredging Research Technical
Notes. DRP-2-05. 1992. Fluid
Mud Survey Investigations at the Calcasieu Lake Entrance Channel,
Louisiana. Dredging Research Technical Notes. DRP-2-08. 1994.
Risk
Analysis of Navigational Safety in Danish Waters. Danish Maritime
Authority. June 2002. Port
of Houston/Galveston, Texas, After Action Report. Port Assesment
Houston/Galveston. 2003. Safety
Assesment in Ports. Johan
H. de Jong, C. van der Tak. MARIN/MSCN nautical consultancy and
training. Decision
and Risk Analysis. Jason R. W. Merrick. Virginia Commonwealth
University. Making
Decisions about Safety in US Ports and Waterways. Jason R. W. Merrick.
Virginia Commonwealth University. Presentation
from Rapporteur M1 – Risk Management as Applied to Aids to Navigation. Jens
Peter Hartmann. Port
Capacity Versus Port Safety. R. Groenveld. 2004.
|